Protocol Revision: draft
User Interaction Model
Implementations are free to expose logging through any interface pattern that suits their needs—the protocol itself does not mandate any specific user interaction model.Capabilities
Servers that emit log message notifications MUST declare thelogging
capability:
Log Levels
The protocol follows the standard syslog severity levels specified in RFC 5424:Level | Description | Example Use Case |
---|---|---|
debug | Detailed debugging information | Function entry/exit points |
info | General informational messages | Operation progress updates |
notice | Normal but significant events | Configuration changes |
warning | Warning conditions | Deprecated feature usage |
error | Error conditions | Operation failures |
critical | Critical conditions | System component failures |
alert | Action must be taken immediately | Data corruption detected |
emergency | System is unusable | Complete system failure |
Protocol Messages
Setting Log Level
To configure the minimum log level, clients MAY send alogging/setLevel
request:
Request:
Log Message Notifications
Servers send log messages usingnotifications/message
notifications:
Message Flow
Error Handling
Servers SHOULD return standard JSON-RPC errors for common failure cases:- Invalid log level:
-32602
(Invalid params) - Configuration errors:
-32603
(Internal error)
Implementation Considerations
-
Servers SHOULD:
- Rate limit log messages
- Include relevant context in data field
- Use consistent logger names
- Remove sensitive information
-
Clients MAY:
- Present log messages in the UI
- Implement log filtering/search
- Display severity visually
- Persist log messages
Security
-
Log messages MUST NOT contain:
- Credentials or secrets
- Personal identifying information
- Internal system details that could aid attacks
-
Implementations SHOULD:
- Rate limit messages
- Validate all data fields
- Control log access
- Monitor for sensitive content